People with admin or owner permissions can set up a CODEOWNERS file in a repository.
The people you choose as code owners must have write permissions for the repository. When the code owner is a team, that team must be visible and it must have write permissions, even if all the individual members of the team already have write permissions directly, through organization membership, or through another team membership.
Code owners are automatically requested for review when someone opens a pull request that modifies code that they own. Code owners are not automatically requested to review draft pull requests. For more information about draft pull requests, see "About pull requests." When you mark a draft pull request as ready for review, code owners are automatically notified. If you convert a pull request to a draft, people who are already subscribed to notifications are not automatically unsubscribed. For more information, see "Changing the stage of a pull request."
When someone with admin or owner permissions has enabled required reviews, they also can optionally require approval from a code owner before the author can merge a pull request in the repository. For more information, see "About protected branches."
If a file has a code owner, you can see who the code owner is before you open a pull request. In the repository, you can browse to the file and hover over .
To use a CODEOWNERS file, create a new file called
CODEOWNERS in the root,
.github/ directory of the repository, in the branch where you'd like to add the code owners.
Each CODEOWNERS file assigns the code owners for a single branch in the repository. Thus, you can assign different code owners for different branches, such as
@octo-org/codeowners-team for a code base on the default branch and
@octocat for a GitHub Pages site on the
For code owners to receive review requests, the CODEOWNERS file must be on the base branch of the pull request. For example, if you assign
@octocat as the code owner for .js files on the
gh-pages branch of your repository,
@octocat will receive review requests when a pull request with changes to .js files is opened between the head branch and
Warning: There are some syntax rules for gitignore files that do not work in CODEOWNERS files:
- Escaping a pattern starting with
\so it is treated as a pattern and not a comment
!to negate a pattern
[ ]to define a character range
A CODEOWNERS file uses a pattern that follows most of the same rules used in gitignore files. The pattern is followed by one or more GitHub usernames or team names using the standard
@org/team-name format. Users and teams must have explicit
write access to the repository, even if the team's members already have access.
You can also refer to a user by an email address that has been added to their account on your GitHub Enterprise Server instance, for example
CODEOWNERS paths are case sensitive, because GitHub uses a case sensitive file system. Since CODEOWNERS are evaluated by GitHub, even systems that are case insensitive (for example, macOS) must use paths and files that are cased correctly in the CODEOWNERS file.
If any line in your CODEOWNERS file contains invalid syntax, the file will not be detected and will not be used to request reviews.
# This is a comment. # Each line is a file pattern followed by one or more owners. # These owners will be the default owners for everything in # the repo. Unless a later match takes precedence, # @global-owner1 and @global-owner2 will be requested for # review when someone opens a pull request. * @global-owner1 @global-owner2 # Order is important; the last matching pattern takes the most # precedence. When someone opens a pull request that only # modifies JS files, only @js-owner and not the global # owner(s) will be requested for a review. *.js @js-owner # You can also use email addresses if you prefer. They'll be # used to look up users just like we do for commit author # emails. *.go email@example.com # Teams can be specified as code owners as well. Teams should # be identified in the format @org/team-name. Teams must have # explicit write access to the repository. In this example, # the octocats team in the octo-org organization owns all .txt files. *.txt @octo-org/octocats # In this example, @doctocat owns any files in the build/logs # directory at the root of the repository and any of its # subdirectories. /build/logs/ @doctocat # The `docs/*` pattern will match files like # `docs/getting-started.md` but not further nested files like # `docs/build-app/troubleshooting.md`. docs/* firstname.lastname@example.org # In this example, @octocat owns any file in an apps directory # anywhere in your repository. apps/ @octocat # In this example, @doctocat owns any file in the `/docs` # directory in the root of your repository and any of its # subdirectories. /docs/ @doctocat # In this example, any change inside the `/scripts` directory # will require approval from @doctocat or @octocat. /scripts/ @doctocat @octocat # In this example, @octocat owns any file in the `/apps` # directory in the root of your repository except for the `/apps/github` # subdirectory, as its owners are left empty. /apps/ @octocat /apps/github
Repository owners can add branch protection rules to ensure that changed code is reviewed by the owners of the changed files. For more information, see "About protected branches."